Friday, July 5, 2013

Film Journal Entry: The Shining (Stanley Kubrick, 1980)


       This film (based off a novel by Steven King) is the story of a man named Jack Torrence who moves his wife and son out into the isolated Overlook hotel to after he gets the job as the winter caretaker. His goal in isolating himself is to find peace and thus the ability to overcome his writer’s block, but as the film progresses he is pushed more and more over the edge of his sanity by not only the isolation but apparitions from the hotel’s dark history.

            This film is a narrative structured to parallel past events in the hotel. Jack Torrence’s character gradually “snaps” much like the father in the story he is told about in the beginning of the film who murdered his wife and two daughters. In a way, it could be said that the images of the two girls, the partiers, Delbert Grady (the past caretaker/murderous father) are in a manner flash-backs. In many ways this is a film about Karma. The characters have to keep reliving a horrible past event until they get the outcome right. Like Delbert Grady, Jack Torrence looses it and goes after his wife and son. Though Jack Torrence doesn’t have two daughters as Grady did, the twosome could be said to be represented as two-in-one in the son Danny and his imaginary friend: Tony. The first ‘flashbacks’ that the characters have (mainly Danny) are all of deceased characters, but as the film progresses the images become more symbolic metaphors for the relationship between Jack and his wife. When Jack first encounters the ghost bartender Lloyd (whose name means grey-haired which alludes to wisdom and someone deserving of respect) he confides in the apparition that he is not sexually gratified, this later plays out in the scene where he encounters a nude woman in the bathroom of the room where Grady left his murdered family. The nude woman transforms into that of a rotting old hag, which may represent his decaying relationship with his wife and the horror of it. Another scene which expresses this is the short clip where the wife (Wendy Torrence) happens upon a person in a bear costume with an old man on the bed. Again the wife is represented by a figure that is old, but this time, what can be assumed is a representation of Jack Torrence, is not himself but a costume of an animal that is dangerous and savage. The non-diegetic music does a lot to build suspense in this film and even sometimes worked with the diegetic sounds to create an ominous atmosphere. For example: when the camera is following Danny (whose name may be a reference to the biblical character Daniel who was imprisoned in a lion’s den) on his tricycle through the hotel, the sounds of his wheels rumbling on the tile and then dully thrumming on the carpet was punctuated with music that made the diegetic sounds almost like drum-rolls. Also, the music that played in the Gold Ballroom from the roaring twenties tied the ghosts and Jack Torrence back to the past.

                As the film progresses and we’ve determined that Jack Torrence is dissatisfied with his life on various levels, we discover that he actually seems to be enjoying his madness. As he becomes more and more derailed mentally the ghosts become more and more prominent, and at one point (close to the final moments) the ghost of Grady who now has the top of his head blown off asks the wife “if she is enjoying the party”. It seems at the beginning that the son is the only other person besides Jack who can see these characters. Jack is of course becoming more and more unstable and Danny has a special ability which is brought to his attention by Dick Holloran, the hotel chef. Danny has “the shining”, a psychic ability. Dick says that he has this ability as well, and that it allows Danny to hear what others are thinking. Danny is also referred to by this character as “Doc,” which is a reference to Bugs Bunny who calls Elmer Fudd (Bugs’ arch enemy who is intent on hunting down and killing him). Danny may be being paralleled here to the rabbit and therefore Jack Torrence would be the hunter. When Danny is being hunted by his father he is able to use his “shining” to call Dick to come and check on them, this doesn’t end well as Dick becomes a victim of Jack, but this gives Danny the chance to get ahead of Jack (his pursuer) and make it to the hedge maze which is just akin to the Overlook hotel. This maze bears an important significance as it is like a trap, once in it it’s difficult to find your way out. In many ways the hotel parallels the maze, as it too is presented as a large winding structure full of hallways and empty rooms. These mazes represent Jack’s own psychosis and feelings and finally Wendy and Danny’s when they are attempting to escape Jack. The colors in the hotel also seem to become more and more garish as the film progresses which represent the rising intensity of Jack’s lunacy. These colors make the feeling of entrapment more intense as the walls become more and more red, giving a strong sense of danger. All the strange color combinations also show imbalance.

            Jack, enjoying his hunt is finally trapped himself in the very snow that isolates the hotel. He joins his ghostly illusions and makes the viewer wonder if the ghosts have adopted him into their circle (which enjoys reveling in their bloody past) or whether he was the reincarnation of Grady and his past victims needed to escape him.

Saturday, June 1, 2013

Les Mis

So, I have not been doing so hot with keeping up my blog and have some catching up to do. I've been working two jobs and going to school full time, but hey! No excuses, right? This is long overdue, but at the beginning of this year I got to go and see the movie production of "Les Miserables" (Tom Hooper, 2012) with family and friends.
Before I continue, I must shamefully admit that I have never seen the stage production, but from what I have heard word-of-mouth and from the songs and DVDs my friends have been sharing with me it must be well worth seeing.
I enjoyed the film version of "Les Miserables". I thought that the cinematography was quite beautiful and the editing was well executed. The performances of the actors was rendered very well and I feel that this type of stage-to-film musical was delivered in such a way that it could reach out to an audience that hasn't had much exposure to musicals.
My only beef with the film was that all the singing was in real-time. While this is just a matter of opinion, I felt that if I were to go and hear real-time singing I would have preferred to go to a play production. Maybe it's just me, but I kind of feel like the purpose of putting a stage production onto the silver screen is so that it can sound studio perfect. One of the things that makes the stage great is that you can see and hear all the little imperfections, the human hand adds interest, the beauties and nuances are a moment for the audience to grasp onto. But film is a time capsule. I just think its silly to encapsulate something like a flat note or a voice cracking. Sure we can say that its the raw thing, but there are only so many times one can listen to the same flat note over and over again.
I know, and I have been told, that film should be "real", but if you can make something seamless for future generations to look at, I ask, why not? I don't love the film version of "The Sound of Music" (Robert Wise, 1965) because I could tell that the actors were people who sometimes couldn't hit a note, I enjoyed it because people had taken the pains to make sure that every note was hit.
While watching live performances I don't mind slightly flat notes and other such hiccups as much, because I am in awe that a person is putting themselves out there like that. That they have the ability to get up on stage and belt it out. But on camera one doesn't need to belt it out, and the type of display is intrinsically different.
I felt that the fact that the movie was live singing was merely an effort to land some sort of cool points with audiences and reviewers, but I honestly don't think that it helped the film.
Other than that, I really did enjoy the movie and I am interested in actually seeing the stage production. Which is something I appreciate about movies like this, because it gets audiences interested in actually seeing the stage version, singing the songs, or reading the novel by Victor Hugo. It's good to broaden audience's interests and I think that this is something that this film definitely does.